ID: 1204.1450

Solving the Odd Perfect Number Problem: Some Old and New Approaches

April 6, 2012

View on ArXiv
Jose Arnaldo B. Dris
Mathematics
Number Theory

A perfect number is a positive integer $N$ such that the sum of all the positive divisors of $N$ equals $2N$, denoted by $\sigma(N) = 2N$. The question of the existence of odd perfect numbers (OPNs) is one of the longest unsolved problems of number theory. This thesis presents some of the old as well as new approaches to solving the OPN Problem. In particular, a conjecture predicting an injective and surjective mapping $X = \sigma(p^k)/p^k, Y = \sigma(m^2)/m^2$ between OPNs $N = {p^k}{m^2}$ (with Euler factor $p^k$) and rational points on the hyperbolic arc $XY = 2$ with $1 < X < 1.25 < 1.6 < Y < 2$ and $2.85 < X + Y < 3$, is disproved. Various results on the abundancy index and solitary numbers are used in the disproof. Numerical evidence against the said conjecture will likewise be discussed. We will show that if an OPN $N$ has the form above, then $p^k < (2/3){m^2}$ follows from \cite{D10}. We will also attempt to prove a conjectured improvement of this last result to $p^k < m$ by observing that $\sigma(p^k)/m \neq 1$ and $\sigma(p^k)/m \neq \sigma(m)/p^k$ in all cases. Lastly, we also prove the following generalization: If $N = \displaystyle\prod_{i=1}^r {{p_i}^{{\alpha}_i}}$ is the canonical factorization of an OPN $N$, then $$\sigma({p_i}^{{\alpha}_i}) \leq (2/3){\frac{N}{{p_i}^{{\alpha}_i}}}$$ for all $i$. This gives rise to the inequality $$N^{2 - r} \leq (1/3)(2/3)^{r - 1}$$ which is true for all $r$, where $r = \omega(N)$ is the number of distinct prime factors of $N$.

Similar papers 1

Solving the Odd Perfect Number Problem: Some New Approaches

April 25, 2012

96% Match
Jose Arnaldo B. Dris
Number Theory

A conjecture predicting an injective and surjective mapping $X = \displaystyle\frac{\sigma(p^k)}{p^k}, Y = \displaystyle\frac{\sigma(m^2)}{m^2}$ between OPNs $N = {p^k}{m^2}$ (with Euler factor $p^k$) and rational points on the hyperbolic arc $XY = 2$ with $1 < X < 1.25 < 1.6 < Y < 2$ and $2.85 < X + Y < 3$, is disproved. We will show that if an OPN $N$ has the form above, then $p^k < {2/3}{m^2}$. We then give a somewhat weaker corollary to this last result ($m^2 - p^k \ge 8$...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

On the Components of an Odd Perfect Number

June 14, 2012

89% Match
Jose Arnaldo B. Dris
Number Theory

If $N = {p^k}{m^2}$ is an odd perfect number with special prime factor $p$, then it is proved that ${p^k} < (2/3){m^2}$. Numerical results on the abundancy indices $\frac{\sigma(p^k)}{p^k}$ and $\frac{\sigma(m^2)}{m^2}$, and the ratios $\frac{\sigma(p^k)}{m^2}$ and $\frac{\sigma(m^2)}{p^k}$, are used. It is also showed that $m^2 > \frac{\sqrt{6}}{2}({10}^{150})$.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

New techniques for bounds on the total number of Prime Factors of an Odd Perfect Number

January 5, 2005

89% Match
Kevin G. Hare
Number Theory

Let $\sigma(n)$ denote the sum of the positive divisors of $n$. We say that $n$ is perfect if $\sigma(n) = 2 n$. Currently there are no known odd perfect numbers. It is known that if an odd perfect number exists, then it must be of the form $N = p^\alpha \prod_{j=1}^k q_j^{2 \beta_j}$, where $p, q_1, ..., q_k$ are distinct primes and $p \equiv \alpha\equiv 1 \pmod{4}$. Define the total number of prime factors of $N$ as $\Omega(N) := \alpha + 2 \sum_{j=1}^k \beta_j$. Sayers sh...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

A note on odd perfect numbers

March 8, 2011

88% Match
Jose Arnaldo B. Dris, Florian Luca
Number Theory

In this note, we show that if $N$ is an odd perfect number and $q^{\alpha}$ is some prime power exactly dividing it, then $\sigma(N/q^{\alpha})/q^{\alpha}>5$. In general, we also show that if $\sigma(N/q^{\alpha})/q^{\alpha}<K$, where $K$ is any constant, then $N$ is bounded by some function depending on $K$.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Note on the Theory of Perfect Numbers

February 8, 2011

88% Match
N. A. Carella
General Mathematics

A perfect number is a number whose divisors add up to twice the number itself. The existence of odd perfect numbers is a millennia-old unsolved problem. This note proposes a proof of the nonexistence of odd perfect numbers. More generally, the same analysis seems to generalize to a proof of the nonexistence of odd multiperfect numbers.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

A Proof of the Odd Perfect Number Conjecture

January 8, 2004

87% Match
Simon Davis
High Energy Physics - Theory

It is sufficient to prove that there is an excess of prime factors in the product of repunits with odd prime bases defined by the sum of divisors of the integer $N=(4k+1)^{4m+1}\prod_{i=1}^\ell ~ q_i^{2\alpha_i}$ to establish that there do not exist any odd integers with equality between $\sigma(N)$ and 2N. The existence of distinct prime divisors in the repunits in $\sigma(N)$ follows from a theorem on the primitive divisors of the Lucas sequences $U_{2\alpha_i+1}(q_i+1,q_i)...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

A Sufficient Condition for Disproving Descartes's Conjecture on Odd Perfect Numbers

November 10, 2013

87% Match
Jose Arnaldo B. Dris
Number Theory

Let $\sigma(x)$ be the sum of the divisors of $x$. If $N$ is odd and $\sigma(N) = 2N$, then the odd perfect number $N$ is said to be given in Eulerian form if $N = {q^k}{n^2}$ where $q$ is prime with $q \equiv k \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ and $\gcd(q,n) = 1$. In this note, we show that $q < n$ implies that Descartes's conjecture (previously Sorli's conjecture), $k = \nu_{q}(N) = 1$, is not true. This then implies an unconditional proof for the biconditional $$k = \nu_{q}(N) = 1 \Longl...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

On the third largest prime divisor of an odd perfect number

August 26, 2019

87% Match
Sean Bibby, Pieter Vyncke, Joshua Zelinsky
Number Theory

Let $N$ be an odd perfect number and let $a$ be its third largest prime divisor, $b$ be the second largest prime divisor, and $c$ be its largest prime divisor. We discuss steps towards obtaining a non-trivial upper bound on $a$, as well as the closely related problem of improving bounds $bc$, and $abc$. In particular, we prove two results. First we prove a new general bound on any prime divisor of an odd perfect number and obtain as a corollary of that bound that $$a < 2N^{\f...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

On the divisibility of odd perfect numbers by a high power of a prime

November 16, 2005

87% Match
Tomohiro Yamada
Number Theory

We study some divisibility properties of multiperfect numbers. Our main result is: if $N=p_1^{\alpha_1}... p_s^{\alpha_s} q_1^{2\beta_1}... q_t^{2\beta_t}$ with $\beta_1, ..., \beta_t$ in some finite set S satisfies $\sigma(N)=\frac{n}{d}N$, then N has a prime factor smaller than C, where C is an effective computable constant depending only on s, n, S.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Odd Multiperfect Numbers

February 22, 2011

87% Match
Shi-Chao Chen, Hao Luo
Number Theory

A natural number $n$ is called {\it multiperfect} or {\it$k$-perfect} for integer $k\ge2$ if $\sigma(n)=kn$, where $\sigma(n)$ is the sum of the positive divisors of $n$. In this paper, we establish the structure theorem of odd multiperfect numbers analogous as Euler's theorem on odd perfect numbers. We prove the divisibility of the Euler part of odd multiperfect numbers and characterize the forms of odd perfect numbers $n=\pi^\alpha M^2$ such that $\pi\equiv\alpha(\text{mod}...

Find SimilarView on arXiv