Measuring Abundance with Abundancy Index

Using an extension of the abundancy index to imaginary quadratic rings with unique factorization, we define what we call $n$-powerfully perfect numbers in these rings. This definition serves to extend the concept of perfect numbers that have been defined and studied in the integers. We investigate the properties of $2$-powerfully perfect numbers in the rings $\mathcal O_{\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-1})}$, $\mathcal O_{\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-2})}$, and $\mathcal O_{\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-7})}$, t...

A positive integer $n$ is called an abundant number if $\sigma (n)\ge 2n$, where $\sigma (n)$ is the sum of all positive divisors of $n$. Let $E(x)$ be the largest number of consecutive abundant numbers not exceeding $x$. In 1935, P. Erd\H os proved that there are two positive constants $c_1$ and $c_2$ such that $c_1\log\log\log x\le E(x)\le c_2\log\log\log x$. In this paper, we resolve this old problem by proving that, $E(x)/\log \log\log x$ tends to a limit as $x\to +\infty...

Robin's theorem is one of the ingenious reformulation of the Riemann hypothesis (RH). It states that the RH is true if and only if $\sigma(n)<e^\gamma n\log\log n$ for all $n>5040$ where $\sigma(n)$ is the sum of divisors of $n$ and $\gamma$ is Euler's constant. In this paper we show that how the RH is delicate in terms of certain subsets of superabundant numbers, namely extremely abundant numbers and some of its specific supersets.

In 1915, Ramanujan proved asymptotic inequalities for the sum of divisors function, assuming the Riemann hypothesis (RH). We consider a strong version of Ramanujan's theorem and define highest abundant numbers that are extreme with respect to the Ramanujan and Robin inequalities. Properties of these numbers are very different depending on whether the RH is true or false.

This article establishes a new upper bound on the function $\sigma^{*}(n)$, the sum of all coprime divisors of $n$. The article concludes with two questions concerning this function.

A perfect number is a positive integer $N$ such that the sum of all the positive divisors of $N$ equals $2N$, denoted by $\sigma(N) = 2N$. The question of the existence of odd perfect numbers (OPNs) is one of the longest unsolved problems of number theory. This thesis presents some of the old as well as new approaches to solving the OPN Problem. In particular, a conjecture predicting an injective and surjective mapping $X = \sigma(p^k)/p^k, Y = \sigma(m^2)/m^2$ between OPNs $...

Define $s (n) := n^{- 1} \sigma (n)$ ($\sigma (n):=\sum_{d|n}d )$ and $\omega(n)$ is the number of prime divisors of $n$. One of the properties of $s$ plays a central role: $s (p^a) > s (q^b)$ if $p < q$ are prime numbers, with no special condition on $a, b$ other than $a, b \geqslant 1$. This result, combined with the Multiplicity Permutation theorem, will help us establish properties of the next counterexample (say $c$) to Robin's inequality $s (n) < e^{\gamma} \log \log n$...

Using an extension of the abundancy index to imaginary quadratic rings that are unique factorization domains, we investigate what we call $n$-powerfully $t$-perfect numbers in these rings. This definition serves to extend the concept of multiperfect numbers that have been defined and studied in the integers. At the end of the paper, as well as at various points throughout the paper, we point to some potential areas for further research.

If $N = {p^k}{m^2}$ is an odd perfect number with special prime factor $p$, then it is proved that ${p^k} < (2/3){m^2}$. Numerical results on the abundancy indices $\frac{\sigma(p^k)}{p^k}$ and $\frac{\sigma(m^2)}{m^2}$, and the ratios $\frac{\sigma(p^k)}{m^2}$ and $\frac{\sigma(m^2)}{p^k}$, are used. It is also showed that $m^2 > \frac{\sqrt{6}}{2}({10}^{150})$.

Let $\sigma(n)$ denote the sum of the positive divisors of $n$. We say that $n$ is perfect if $\sigma(n) = 2 n$. Currently there are no known odd perfect numbers. It is known that if an odd perfect number exists, then it must be of the form $N = p^\alpha \prod_{j=1}^k q_j^{2 \beta_j}$, where $p, q_1, ..., q_k$ are distinct primes and $p \equiv \alpha\equiv 1 \pmod{4}$. Define the total number of prime factors of $N$ as $\Omega(N) := \alpha + 2 \sum_{j=1}^k \beta_j$. Sayers sh...