Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette

The main results of papers gr-qc/0307026 and gr-qc/0312068 are formulated. These results are opposite to conclusions of paper astro-ph/0305039 and comments gr-qc/0309036.

We clarify the relationship between the conclusions of the previous Comment of A. Helfer [1] and that of our Brief Report [arXiv:0906.5315]

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

In this Reply we argue that the conclusions derived in Ref. arXiv:1301.1241 are questionable.

I respond to the Bernard et al. comment on my letter ``Chiral anomalies and rooted staggered fermions.''

This is an addendum to the Reply Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139602 (2009), arXiv:0811.0518] to Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139601 (2009), arXiv:0810.4791] on Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101 (2008), arXiv:0804.1898].

This is our formal Reply to revised version (v2) of arXiv: nucl-th/0510004v2.

We reply to recent criticisms of the SIMPLE project by J.I. Collar [arxiv:1106.3559]

We respond to the accompanying Comment on our paper, 'Validity of certain soft photon amplitudes'. While we hope the discussion here clarifies the issues, we have found nothing which leads to a change in the original conclusions of our paper.

The above hep-th posting purports -- erroneously -- to be a comment on a Note by me in gr-qc.