ID: math/0503014

An inverse theorem for the Gowers U^3 norm

March 1, 2005

View on ArXiv

Similar papers 5

Improved bounds for five-term arithmetic progressions

December 17, 2023

84% Match
James Leng, Ashwin Sah, Mehtaab Sawhney
Number Theory
Combinatorics

Let $r_5(N)$ be the largest cardinality of a set in $\{1,\ldots,N\}$ which does not contain $5$ elements in arithmetic progression. Then there exists a constant $c\in (0,1)$ such that \[r_5(N)\ll \frac{N}{\exp((\log\log N)^{c})}.\] Our work is a consequence of recent improved bounds on the $U^4$-inverse theorem of the first author and the fact that $3$-step nilsequences may be approximated by locally cubic functions on shifted Bohr sets. This combined with the density increme...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Gowers norms for singular measures

August 13, 2013

84% Match
Marc Carnovale
Classical Analysis and ODEs

Gowers introduced the notion of uniformity norm $\|f\|_{U^k(G)}$ of a bounded function $f:G\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ on an abelian group $G$ in order to provide a Fourier-theoretic proof of Szemeredi's Theorem, that is, that a subset of the integers of positive upper density contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. Since then, Gowers norms have found a number of other uses, both within and outside of Additive Combinatorics. The $U^k$ norm is defined in terms of an oper...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Towards $3n-4$ in groups of prime order

February 16, 2023

84% Match
Vsevolod F. Lev, Oriol Serra
Number Theory

We show that if $A$ is a subset of a group of prime order $p$ such that $|2A|<2.7652|A|$ and $|A|<1.25\cdot10^{-6}p$, then $A$ is contained in an arithmetic progression with at most $|2A|-|A|+1$ terms, and $2A$ contains an arithmetic progression with the same difference and at least $2|A|-1$ terms. This improves a number of previously known results.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Popular progression differences in vector spaces II

August 28, 2017

84% Match
Jacob Fox, Huy Tuan Pham
Combinatorics
Number Theory

Green used an arithmetic analogue of Szemer\'edi's celebrated regularity lemma to prove the following strengthening of Roth's theorem in vector spaces. For every $\alpha>0$, $\beta<\alpha^3$, and prime number $p$, there is a least positive integer $n_p(\alpha,\beta)$ such that if $n \geq n_p(\alpha,\beta)$, then for every subset of $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ of density at least $\alpha$ there is a nonzero $d$ for which the density of three-term arithmetic progressions with common diffe...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

The ergodic and combinatorial approaches to Szemer\'edi's theorem

April 20, 2006

84% Match
Terence Tao
Combinatorics

A famous theorem of Szemer\'edi asserts that any set of integers of positive upper density will contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. In its full generality, we know of four types of arguments that can prove this theorem: the original combinatorial (and graph-theoretical) approach of Szemer\'edi, the ergodic theory approach of Furstenberg, the Fourier-analytic approach of Gowers, and the hypergraph approach of Nagle-R\"odl-Schacht-Skokan and Gowers. In this lectur...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Subsets of F_p^n without three term arithmetic progressions have several large Fourier coefficients

July 10, 2007

83% Match
Ernie Croot
Combinatorics
Number Theory

Suppose that f : F_p^n -> [0,1] has expected value t in [p^(-n/9),1] (so, the density t can be quite low!). Furthermore, suppose that support(f) has no three-term arithmetic progressions. Then, we develop non-trivial lower bounds for f_j, which is the jth largest Fourier coefficient of f. This result is similar in spirit to that appearing in an earlier paper [1] by the author; however, in that paper the focus was on the ``small'' Fourier coefficients, whereas here the focus...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Four-term progression free sets with three-term progressions in all large subsets

May 21, 2019

83% Match
Cosmin Pohoata, Oliver Roche-Newton
Combinatorics
Number Theory

This paper is mainly concerned with sets which do not contain four-term arithmetic progressions, but are still very rich in three term arithmetic progressions, in the sense that all sufficiently large subsets contain at least one such progression. We prove that there exists a positive constant $c$ and a set $A \subset \mathbb F_q^n$ which does not contain a four-term arithmetic progression, with the property that for every subset $A' \subset A$ with $|A'| \geq |A|^{1-c}$, $A'...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

An equivalence between inverse sumset theorems and inverse conjectures for the U^3 norm

June 17, 2009

83% Match
Ben Green, Terence Tao
Number Theory
Combinatorics

We establish a correspondence between inverse sumset theorems (which can be viewed as classifications of approximate (abelian) groups) and inverse theorems for the Gowers norms (which can be viewed as classifications of approximate polynomials). In particular, we show that the inverse sumset theorems of Freiman type are equivalent to the known inverse results for the Gowers U^3 norms, and moreover that the conjectured polynomial strengthening of the former is also equivalent ...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Progression-free sets in Z_4^n are exponentially small

May 5, 2016

83% Match
Ernie Croot, Vsevolod Lev, Peter Pach
Number Theory
Combinatorics

We show that for integer $n>0$, any subset $A \subset Z_4^n$ free of three-term arithmetic progressions has size $|A| < 4^{c n}$, with an absolute constant $c \approx 0.926$.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Popular progression differences in vector spaces

August 28, 2017

83% Match
Jacob Fox, Huy Tuan Pham
Combinatorics
Number Theory

Green proved an arithmetic analogue of Szemer\'edi's celebrated regularity lemma and used it to verify a conjecture of Bergelson, Host, and Kra which sharpens Roth's theorem on three-term arithmetic progressions in dense sets. It shows that for every subset of $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ with $n$ sufficiently large, the density of three-term arithmetic progressions with some nonzero common difference is at least the random bound (the cube of the set density) up to an additive $\epsilon$...

Find SimilarView on arXiv