ID: math/0509025

Counting the Positive Rationals: A Brief Survey

September 1, 2005

View on ArXiv

Similar papers 4

Modeling rational numbers by Cantor series

April 15, 2019

82% Match
Symon Serbenyuk
Number Theory

In the present article, modeling certain rational numbers, that are represented in terms of Cantor series, are described. The statements on relations between digits in the representations of rational numbers by Cantor series (for the case of an arbitrary sequence $(q_k)$) are proved.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Counting systems and the First Hilbert problem

March 14, 2012

82% Match
Yaroslav D. Sergeyev
General Mathematics

The First Hilbert problem is studied in this paper by applying two instruments: a new methodology distinguishing between mathematical objects and mathematical languages used to describe these objects; and a new numeral system allowing one to express different infinite numbers and to use these numbers for measuring infinite sets. Several counting systems are taken into consideration. It is emphasized in the paper that different mathematical languages can describe mathematical ...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Egyptian Fractions with Denominators from Sequences Closed Under Doubling

September 24, 2021

82% Match
David Eppstein
Number Theory

Resolving a conjecture of Zhi-Wei Sun, we prove that every rational number can be represented as a sum of distinct unit fractions whose denominators are practical numbers. The same method applies to allowed denominators that are closed under multiplication by two and include a multiple of every positive integer, including the odious numbers, evil numbers, Hardy-Ramanujan numbers, Jordan-Polya numbers, and fibbinary numbers.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Construction and Categoricity of the Real Number System Using Decimals

June 27, 2019

82% Match
Arindama Singh
General Mathematics

In this expository article, the real numbers are defined as infinite decimals. After defining an ordering relation and the arithmetic operations, it is shown that the set of real numbers is a complete ordered field. It is further shown that any complete ordered field is isomorphic to the constructed set of real numbers.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Denser Egyptian Fractions

November 18, 1998

82% Match
Greg Martin
Number Theory

An Egyptian fraction is a sum of distinct unit fractions (reciprocals of positive integers). We show that every rational number has Egyptian fraction representations where the number of terms is of the same order of magnitude as the largest denominator, improving a result from an earlier paper to best-possible form. We also settle, in best-possible form, the related problem of how small M_t(r) can be such that there is an Egyptian fraction representation of r with exactly t t...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Real numbers as infinite decimals -- theory and computation

November 22, 2018

82% Match
Nicolas Fardin, Liangpan Li
History and Overview
Number Theory

In the 16th century, Simon Stevin initiated a modern approach to decimal representation of measuring numbers, marking a transition from the discrete arithmetic practised by the Greeks to the arithmetic of the continuum taken for granted today. However, how to perform arithmetic directly on infinite decimals remains a long-standing problem, which has seen the popular degeometrisation of real numbers since the first constructions were published in around 1872. Our article is de...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Each positive rational number has the form $\varphi(m^2)/\varphi(n^2)$

January 11, 2020

81% Match
Dmitry Krachun, Zhi-Wei Sun
History and Overview
Number Theory

In this note, we show that each positive rational number can be written as $\varphi(m^2)/\varphi(n^2)$, where $\varphi$ is Euler's totient function and $m$ and $n$ are positive integers.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

On the cardinality of the set of the real numbers

March 20, 2001

81% Match
Jailton C. Ferreira
General Mathematics

It is shown that any denumerable list L to which Cantor's diagonal method was applied is incomplete. However, this doesn't allow us to affirm that the cardinality of the real numbers of the interval [0, 1] is greater than the cardinality of the finite natural numbers. Paper withdrawn (its essential part is included in the version 3 of math.GM/0108119).

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Debunking Cantor: New Set-Theoretical and Logical Considerations

March 14, 2023

81% Match
Juan A Perez
General Mathematics

For more than a century, Cantor's theory of transfinite numbers has played a pivotal role in set theory, with ramifications that extend to many areas of mathematics. This article extends earlier findings with a fresh look at the critical facts of Cantor's theory: i) Cantor's widely renowned Diagonalization Argument (CDA) is fully refuted by a set of counter-examples that expose the fallacy of this proof. ii) The logical inconsistencies of CDA are revisited, exposing the short...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Taking rational numbers at random

August 19, 2019

81% Match
Nicola Cufaro Petroni
Probability

We outline some simple prescriptions to define a distribution on the set $\mathbb{Q}_0$ of all the rational numbers in $[0,1]$, and we then explore both a few properties of these distributions, and the possibility of making these rational numbers asymptotically equiprobable in a suitable sense. In particular it will be shown that in the said limit -- albeit no uniform distribution can be properly defined on $\mathbb{Q}_0$ -- the probability allotted to a single $q\in\mathbb{Q...

Find SimilarView on arXiv