ID: math/0701801

Deterministic modal Bayesian Logic: derive the Bayesian inference within the modal logic T

January 28, 2007

View on ArXiv

Similar papers 2

Modal Logics -- RNmatrices vs. Nmatrices

December 31, 2024

83% Match
Marcelo E. University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil Coniglio, Paweł Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Pawłowski, Daniel Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany Skurt
Logic in Computer Science

In this short paper we will discuss the similarities and differences between two semantic approaches to modal logics - non-deterministic semantics and restricted non-deterministic semantics. Generally speaking, both kinds of semantics are similar in the sense that they employ non-deterministic matrices as a starting point but differ significantly in the way extensions of the minimal modal logic M are constructed. Both kinds of semantics are many-valued and truth-values are ty...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Towards Unifying Perceptual Reasoning and Logical Reasoning

June 27, 2022

83% Match
Hiroyuki Kido
Artificial Intelligence

An increasing number of scientific experiments support the view of perception as Bayesian inference, which is rooted in Helmholtz's view of perception as unconscious inference. Recent study of logic presents a view of logical reasoning as Bayesian inference. In this paper, we give a simple probabilistic model that is applicable to both perceptual reasoning and logical reasoning. We show that the model unifies the two essential processes common in perceptual and logical system...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Lp : A Logic for Statistical Information

March 27, 2013

83% Match
Fahiem Bacchus
Artificial Intelligence

This extended abstract presents a logic, called Lp, that is capable of representing and reasoning with a wide variety of both qualitative and quantitative statistical information. The advantage of this logical formalism is that it offers a declarative representation of statistical knowledge; knowledge represented in this manner can be used for a variety of reasoning tasks. The logic differs from previous work in probability logics in that it uses a probability distribution ov...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Bayesian Networks and Proof-Nets: a proof-theoretical account of Bayesian Inference

December 29, 2024

83% Match
Thomas Ehrhard, Claudia Faggian, Michele Pagani
Logic in Computer Science

We uncover a strong correspondence between Bayesian Networks and (Multiplicative) Linear Logic Proof-Nets, relating the two as a representation of a joint probability distribution and at the level of computation, so yielding a proof-theoretical account of Bayesian Inference.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Fuzzy Logic and Probability

February 20, 2013

83% Match
Petr Hajek, Lluis Godo, Francesc Esteva
Artificial Intelligence

In this paper we deal with a new approach to probabilistic reasoning in a logical framework. Nearly almost all logics of probability that have been proposed in the literature are based on classical two-valued logic. After making clear the differences between fuzzy logic and probability theory, here we propose a {em fuzzy} logic of probability for which completeness results (in a probabilistic sense) are provided. The main idea behind this approach is that probability values o...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Bayesian Logic Programs

November 23, 2001

83% Match
Kristian Kersting, Raedt Luc De
Artificial Intelligence
Logic in Computer Science

Bayesian networks provide an elegant formalism for representing and reasoning about uncertainty using probability theory. Theyare a probabilistic extension of propositional logic and, hence, inherit some of the limitations of propositional logic, such as the difficulties to represent objects and relations. We introduce a generalization of Bayesian networks, called Bayesian logic programs, to overcome these limitations. In order to represent objects and relations it combines B...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

A modal aleatoric calculus for probabilistic reasoning: extended version

December 31, 2018

83% Match
Tim French, Andrew Gozzard, Mark Reynolds
Logic in Computer Science

We consider multi-agent systems where agents actions and beliefs are determined aleatorically, or "by the throw of dice". This system consists of possible worlds that assign distributions to independent random variables, and agents who assign probabilities to these possible worlds. We present a novel syntax and semantics for such system, and show that they generalise Modal Logic. We also give a sound and complete calculus for reasoning in the base semantics, and a sound calcu...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Computational Aspects of Dependence Logic

June 20, 2012

82% Match
Peter Lohmann
Logic in Computer Science
Computational Complexity

In this thesis (modal) dependence logic is investigated. It was introduced in 2007 by Jouko V\"a\"aan\"anen as an extension of first-order (resp. modal) logic by the dependence operator =(). For first-order (resp. propositional) variables x_1,...,x_n, =(x_1,...,x_n) intuitively states that the value of x_n is determined by those of x_1,...,x_n-1. We consider fragments of modal dependence logic obtained by restricting the set of allowed modal and propositional connectives. W...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

A Tutorial Introduction to the Logic of Parametric Probability

January 16, 2012

82% Match
Joseph W. Norman
Logic
Logic in Computer Science
Optimization and Control
Probability

The computational method of parametric probability analysis is introduced. It is demonstrated how to embed logical formulas from the propositional calculus into parametric probability networks, thereby enabling sound reasoning about the probabilities of logical propositions. An alternative direct probability encoding scheme is presented, which allows statements of implication and quantification to be modeled directly as constraints on conditional probabilities. Several exampl...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Simpler completeness proofs for modal logics with intersection

April 5, 2020

82% Match
Yì N. Wáng, Thomas Ågotnes
Logic in Computer Science
Logic

There has been a significant interest in extending various modal logics with intersection, the most prominent examples being epistemic and doxastic logics with distributed knowledge. Completeness proofs for such logics tend to be complicated, in particular on model classes such as S5 like in standard epistemic logic, mainly due to the undefinability of intersection of modalities in standard modal logics. A standard proof method for the S5 case was outlined in [8] and later ex...

Find SimilarView on arXiv