ID: nucl-ex/0002005

A New Measurement of the Muon Magnetic Anomaly

February 8, 2000

View on ArXiv
K. Jungmann, :, g-2 collaboration
Nuclear Experiment

The muon magnetic anomaly may contain contributions from physics beyond the standard model. At the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) a precision experiment aims for a measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly $a_{\mu}$ to 0.35 ppm, where conclusions about various theoretical approaches beyond standard theory can be expected. The difference between the spin precession and cyclotron frequencies is measured in a magnetic storage ring with highly homogeneous field. Data taking is in progress and part of all recorded data has been analyzed. Combining all experimental results to date yields preliminarily $a_{\mu}(expt)=1~165~921(5) \cdot 10^{-9}$ (4 ppm) in agreement with standard theory.

Similar papers 1

Precise Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment

February 8, 2001

93% Match
H. N. Brown, Muon g-2 Collaboration
High Energy Physics - Experi...

A precise measurement of the anomalous g value, a_mu=(g-2)/2, for the positive muon has been made at the Brookhaven Alternating Gradient Synchrotron. The result a_mu^+=11 659 202(14)(6) X 10^{-10} (1.3 ppm) is in good agreement with previous measurements and has an error one third that of the combined previous data. The current theoretical value from the standard model is a_mu(SM)=11 659 159.6(6.7) X 10^{-10} (0.57 ppm) and a_mu(exp)-a_mu(SM)=43(16) X 10^{-10} in which a_mu(e...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Precision Measurement of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon

November 17, 2002

93% Match
Cenap S. Brookhaven National Laboratory Ozben
High Energy Physics - Experi...

The muon g-2 experiment at Brookhaven National Laboratory measures the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, $a_\mu$, very precisely. This measurement tests the Standard Model. The analysis for the data collected in 2000 (a $\mu^+$ run) is completed and the accuracy on $a_\mu$ is improved to 0.7 ppm, including statistical and systematic errors. The data analysis was performed blindly between the precession frequency and the field analysis groups in order to prevent a possibl...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Measurement of the muon anomaly to high and even higher precision

January 20, 2005

93% Match
David W. Hertzog
High Energy Physics - Experi...

Our recent series of measurements at Brookhaven National Laboratory determined the muon anomalous magnetic moment \amu to a precision of 0.5 ppm. The final result--representing the average of five running periods using both positive and negative muons--is $\amu ^\pm = 11 659 208(6) \times 10^{-10}$. It lies 2.7 standard deviations above the standard model expectation, which is based on updates given at this Workshop. Importantly, only the $e^{+}e^{-}$ annihilation and new KLO...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Measurement of the Negative Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.7 ppm

January 10, 2004

92% Match
G. W. Bennett
High Energy Physics - Experi...

The anomalous magnetic moment of the negative muon has been measured to a precision of 0.7 parts per million (ppm) at the Brookhaven Alternating Gradient Synchrotron. This result is based on data collected in 2001, and is over an order of magnitude more precise than the previous measurement of the negative muon. The result a_mu= 11 659 214(8)(3) \times 10^{-10} (0.7 ppm), where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is sytematic, is consistend with previous measu...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Precision Measurement of Muon g-2 at BNL

June 28, 2001

92% Match
Collaboration 2, O. Rind
High Energy Physics - Experi...

The Muon (g-2) Experiment (E821) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) has measured the anomalous magnetic moment of the positive muon to an unprecedented precision of 1.3 parts per million. The result, a_{\mu^+} = (g-2)/2 = 11 659 202(14)(6) X 10^{-10}, is based on data recorded in 1999 and is in good agreement with previous measurements. Upcoming analysis of data recorded in 2000 and 2001 will substantially reduce the uncertainty on this measurement. Comparison of the new...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm

April 7, 2021

92% Match
B. 4 and 49 Abi, T. 4 and 49 Albahri, S. 4 and 49 Al-Kilani, D. 4 and 49 Allspach, L. P. 4 and 49 Alonzi, A. 4 and 49 Anastasi, A. 4 and 49 Anisenkov, F. 47 and 50 Azfar, K. 47 and 50 Badgley, S. 47 and 50 Baeßler, I. 19 and 51 Bailey, V. A. 11 and 32 Baranov, E. 11 and 32 Barlas-Yucel, T. 11 and 32 Barrett, E. 11 and 32 Barzi, A. 11 and 32 Basti, F. 11 and 32 Bedeschi, A. 11 and 32 Behnke, M. 11 and 32 Berz, M. 11 and 32 Bhattacharya, H. P. 11 and 32 Binney, R. 11 and 32 Bjorkquist, P. 11 and 32 Bloom, J. 11 and 32 Bono, E. 11 and 32 Bottalico, T. 13 and 34 Bowcock, D. 13 and 34 Boyden, G. 13 and 34 Cantatore, R. M. 35 and 8 Carey, J. 35 and 8 Carroll, B. C. K. 35 and 8 Casey, D. 35 and 8 Cauz, S. 18 and 5 Ceravolo, R. 18 and 5 Chakraborty, S. P. 18 and 5 Chang, A. 26 and 52 and 53 Chapelain, S. 26 and 52 and 53 Chappa, S. 26 and 52 and 53 Charity, R. 26 and 52 and 53 Chislett, J. 26 and 52 and 53 Choi, Z. 26 and 52 and 53 Chu, T. E. 11 and 32 Chupp, M. E. 11 and 32 Convery, A. 11 and 32 Conway, G. 11 and 32 Corradi, S. 11 and 32 Corrodi, L. 11 and 32 Cotrozzi, J. D. 3 and 37 and 43 Crnkovic, S. 9 and 54 Dabagov, Lurgio P. M. 10 and 30 De, P. T. 10 and 30 Debevec, Falco S. 10 and 30 Di, Meo P. 10 and 30 Di, Sciascio G. 10 and 30 Di, Stefano R. 10 and 30 Di, B. 35 and 13 and 38 Drendel, A. 35 and 13 and 38 Driutti, V. N. 11 and 14 Duginov, M. 11 and 14 Eads, N. 11 and 14 Eggert, A. 11 and 14 Epps, J. 11 and 14 Esquivel, M. 11 and 14 Farooq, R. 11 and 14 Fatemi, C. 11 and 14 Ferrari, M. 48 and 16 Fertl, A. 11 and 14 Fiedler, A. T. 11 and 14 Fienberg, A. 11 and 14 Fioretti, D. 48 and 22 Flay, S. B. 48 and 22 Foster, H. 48 and 22 Friedsam, E. 48 and 22 Frlež, N. S. 48 and 22 Froemming, J. 26 and 52 and 53 Fry, C. 26 and 52 and 53 Fu, C. 11 and 14 Gabbanini, M. D. 11 and 32 Galati, S. 37 and 7 Ganguly, A. 29 and 11 Garcia, D. E. 29 and 11 Gastler, J. 29 and 11 George, L. K. 29 and 11 Gibbons, A. 29 and 11 Gioiosa, K. L. 11 and 32 Giovanetti, P. 11 and 32 Girotti, W. 1 and 42 Gohn, T. 1 and 42 Gorringe, J. 1 and 42 Grange, S. 39 and 51 Grant, F. 39 and 51 Gray, S. 39 and 51 Haciomeroglu, D. 39 and 51 Hahn, T. 39 and 51 Halewood-Leagas, D. 39 and 51 Hampai, F. 39 and 51 Han, E. 39 and 51 Hazen, J. 39 and 51 Hempstead, S. 39 and 51 Henry, A. T. 39 and 51 Herrod, D. W. 1 and 38 Hertzog, G. 1 and 38 Hesketh, A. 1 and 38 Hibbert, Z. 1 and 38 Hodge, J. L. 1 and 38 Holzbauer, K. W. 1 and 38 Hong, R. 1 and 38 Hong, M. 10 and 31 Iacovacci, M. 13 and 45 Incagli, C. 13 and 45 Johnstone, J. A. 13 and 45 Johnstone, P. 13 and 45 Kammel, M. 13 and 45 Kargiantoulakis, M. 13 and 45 Karuza, J. 27 and 26 and 48 and 52 and 53 Kaspar, D. 27 and 26 and 48 and 52 and 53 Kawall, L. 27 and 26 and 48 and 52 and 53 Kelton, A. 27 and 26 and 48 and 52 and 53 Keshavarzi, D. 27 and 26 and 48 and 52 and 53 Kessler, K. S. 27 and 26 and 48 and 52 and 53 Khaw, Z. 7 and 21 Khechadoorian, N. V. 7 and 21 Khomutov, B. 7 and 21 Kiburg, M. 7 and 21 Kiburg, O. 18 and 5 Kim, S. C. 19 and 51 Kim, Y. I. 19 and 51 Kim, B. 19 and 51 King, N. 19 and 51 Kinnaird, M. 19 and 51 Korostelev, I. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Kourbanis, E. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Kraegeloh, V. A. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Krylov, A. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Kuchibhotla, N. A. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Kuchinskiy, K. R. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Labe, J. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 LaBounty, M. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Lancaster, M. J. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Lee, S. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Lee, S. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Leo, B. 26 and 1 and 52 and 53 Li, D. 26 and 55 Li, L. 26 and 52 and 53 Li, I. 4 and 49 Logashenko, A. Lorente 11 and 25 Campos, A. 11 and 25 Lucà, G. 11 and 25 Lukicov, G. 11 and 25 Luo, A. 11 and 25 Lusiani, A. L. 10 and 30 Lyon, B. 10 and 30 MacCoy, R. 10 and 30 Madrak, K. 10 and 30 Makino, F. 10 and 30 Marignetti, S. 2 and 7 Mastroianni, S. 2 and 7 Maxfield, M. 2 and 7 McEvoy, W. 2 and 7 Merritt, A. A. 2 and 7 Mikhailichenko, J. P. 2 and 7 Miller, S. 2 and 7 Miozzi, J. P. 2 and 7 Morgan, W. M. 2 and 7 Morse, J. 2 and 7 Mott, E. 10 and 31 Motuk, A. 10 and 31 Nath, D. 39 and 51 Newton, H. 35 and 8 Nguyen, M. 35 and 8 Oberling, R. 35 and 8 Osofsky, J. -F. 35 and 8 Ostiguy, S. 35 and 8 Park, G. 35 and 8 Pauletta, G. M. 29 and 12 Piacentino, R. N. 11 and 32 Pilato, K. T. 35 and 8 Pitts, B. 35 and 8 Plaster, D. 35 and 8 Počanić, N. 35 and 8 Pohlman, C. C. 35 and 8 Polly, M. 35 and 8 Popovic, J. 35 and 8 Price, B. 35 and 8 Quinn, N. 35 and 8 Raha, S. 35 and 8 Ramachandran, E. 35 and 8 Ramberg, N. T. 35 and 8 Rider, J. L. 35 and 8 Ritchie, B. L. 35 and 8 Roberts, D. L. 35 and 8 Rubin, L. 35 and 8 Santi, D. 23 and 56 Sathyan, H. 23 and 56 Schellman, C. 46 and 2 and 37 Schlesier, A. 46 and 2 and 37 Schreckenberger, Y. K. 5 and 18 Semertzidis, Y. M. 4 and 49 Shatunov, D. 4 and 49 Shemyakin, M. 48 and 11 Shenk, D. 48 and 11 Sim, M. W. 48 and 11 Smith, A. 12 and 33 Smith, A. K. 12 and 33 Soha, M. 12 and 33 Sorbara, D. 22 and 7 Stöckinger, J. 22 and 7 Stapleton, D. 22 and 7 Still, C. 22 and 7 Stoughton, D. 22 and 7 Stratakis, C. 22 and 7 Strohman, T. 22 and 7 Stuttard, H. E. 22 and 7 Swanson, G. 22 and 7 Sweetmore, D. A. 22 and 7 Sweigart, M. J. 22 and 7 Syphers, D. A. 20 and 19 and 27 and 51 Tarazona, T. 20 and 19 and 27 and 51 Teubner, A. E. 20 and 19 and 27 and 51 Tewsley-Booth, K. 20 and 19 and 27 and 51 Thomson, V. 20 and 19 and 27 and 51 Tishchenko, N. H. 20 and 19 and 27 and 51 Tran, W. 20 and 19 and 27 and 51 Turner, E. 20 and 19 and 27 and 51 Valetov, D. 39 and 51 Vasilkova, G. 39 and 51 Venanzoni, V. P. 39 and 51 Volnykh, T. 39 and 51 Walton, M. 39 and 51 Warren, A. 39 and 51 Weisskopf, L. 39 and 51 Welty-Rieger, M. 39 and 51 Whitley, P. 39 and 51 Winter, A. 39 and 51 Wolski, M. Wormald, ... , Yoshikawa C.
High Energy Physics - Experi...
Nuclear Experiment

We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_\mu \equiv (g_\mu-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $\omega_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in a magnetic storage ring. The storage ring magnetic field is measured u...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

The Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment and the Standard Model

January 10, 2003

92% Match
David W. Hertzog
Nuclear Experiment

The muon anomalous magnetic moment measurement, when compared with theory, can be used to test many extensions to the standard model. The most recent measurement made by the Brookhaven E821 Collaboration reduces the uncertainty on the world average of a_mu to 0.7 ppm, comparable in precision to theory. This paper describes the experiment and the current theoretical efforts to establish a correct standard model reference value for the muon anomaly.

Find SimilarView on arXiv

The Muon Anomaly: Experiment and Theory

November 9, 2001

92% Match
J. P. Miller
High Energy Physics - Experi...

A summary is given of the present status of the theory and experiment of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. A difference between predicted and measured values is an indication of physics beyond the Standard Model. A new experimental number has produced a value which differs from a recent Standard Model prediction by about 1.6 standard deviations. When the new result was first announced, the discrepancy was about 2.6 standard deviations, but theorists have recently fou...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

A New Precise Measurement of the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment

May 15, 2001

92% Match
Gerco Onderwater
High Energy Physics - Experi...

The muon (g-2) experiment at BNL has completed four data runs for the positive muon, beginning in 1997 and has just finished its first run for the negative muon. Recently the analysis of a 1.3 ppm result based on the 1999 run was completed and published (a_\mu^+ = 11,659,202(14)(6) x 10^-10). The result shows a tantalizing discrepancy with the Standard Model prediction of 2.6 times the combined experimental and theoretical uncertainty. The muon (g-2) experiment at BNL is ulti...

Find SimilarView on arXiv

Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL

February 20, 2006

92% Match
g-2 Muon, Collaboration, ... , Bennett G. W.
High Energy Physics - Experi...

We present the final report from a series of precision measurements of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, a_mu = (g-2)/2. The details of the experimental method, apparatus, data taking, and analysis are summarized. Data obtained at Brookhaven National Laboratory, using nearly equal samples of positive and negative muons, were used to deduce a_mu(Expt) = 11 659 208.0(5.4)(3.3) x 10^-10, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties are given, respectively. The combined u...

Find SimilarView on arXiv